For most of the past decade, artificial intelligence has answered questions. It recommended movies. It summarized emails. It wrote code snippets. It responded when prompted.
But in 2025 and 2026, something shifted.
According to the Stanford 2024 AI Index, global private investment in AI reached $67.2 billion in 2023, with the United States leading overall AI investment activity. This surge reflects not just interest in generative models, but expanding enterprise deployment of systems capable of decision support and automation.
The evolution toward agentic AI marks a turning point. Instead of reacting to prompts, systems now:
This is not incremental improvement. It is structural change.
The story of agentic AI is not about better chat. It is about autonomy in decision-making.

Agentic AI refers to artificial intelligence systems designed to pursue goals autonomously, using planning, memory, and tool integration to execute tasks with limited human intervention.
Unlike traditional generative systems that produce outputs in isolation, agentic AI operates through:
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) emphasizes in its AI Risk Management Framework that AI systems increasingly operate in dynamic environments where risk must be continuously assessed rather than statically defined. This aligns closely with the operational model of agentic AI, which relies on adaptive reasoning.
Put simply:
Generative AI talks.
Agentic AI acts.

The journey to Agentic AI wasn't a random leap. It was a disciplined march across decades of computing milestones. To understand where we are, we have to see how we got here:
Did you know?
n 1956, the Dartmouth Workshop officially coined the term “artificial intelligence.” Researchers believed machines could simulate human reasoning within a generation. That optimism was premature—but foundational.
As of 2024, Machine Learning still accounted for a 30.4% revenue share in the global market because it remains the backbone of prediction. According to the Stanford AI Index, the growth of large-scale datasets and GPU computing power in the 2010s dramatically accelerated AI performance benchmarks.
Companies like OpenAI and Google DeepMind advanced transformer-based architectures that power modern large language models.
According to a McKinsey report, GenAI could add up to $4.4 trillion annually to the global economy. But GenAI is a "passive" tool—it waits for your prompt.
Did You Know? The concept of an "agent" actually dates back to 400 BCE! Archytas of Tarentum created a mechanical pigeon that could fly independently using steam. It was an "agent" because it had a goal (flight) and the autonomy to act without a human pulling a string for every wing-flap.

While generative AI remains valuable, the distinction is operational:
Feature | Generative AI | Agentic AI |
Trigger | Prompt-based | Goal-based |
Memory | Session-limited | Persistent |
Tool Usage | Limited | Integrated |
Autonomy | Low | High |
Execution | Text/Image Output | Multi-step Task Completion |
The Stanford AI Index notes increasing research into AI agents capable of complex reasoning tasks beyond single-step generation.
The difference is not scale—it is structure.

What makes Agentic AI different from a standard chatbot? It’s all in the plumbing. While a chatbot is mostly just a "mouth" (the LLM), an agent is a full "body" with a nervous system and memory.
By contrast, agentic AI uses memory layers:
Persistent memory enables contextual continuity across sessions.

In the U.S. market, we are seeing a shift from "one AI for everything" to specialized "AI teams."
Milvus highlights that while single-agent systems reduce coordination overhead, MAS offers inherent scalability and robustness—if one agent fails, the entire system doesn't necessarily crumble.
For US enterprises, Agentic AI isn't a hobby—it’s a competitive necessity. The data shows that companies moving past "chatting" into "doing" are seeing massive returns.
The most significant real-world proof of the agentic AI shift is found in Walmart’s latest infrastructure. By late 2025, Walmart moved beyond simple generative chatbots to what they call "Super Agents."
The Problem: Manually managing localized inventory for over 4,600 US stores led to frequent out-of-stock events during regional weather shifts or local events.
The Agentic Solution:
The Outcome:
As Agentic AI takes on more power, the question of supervision becomes critical.
Risk Thresholds: US systems are increasingly built with triggers where any transaction over a certain dollar amount or any decision affecting safety (like medical dosage) requires an explicit human "Green Light."
Trust is the currency of 2026. To build it, Agentic AI must follow strict governance frameworks.
Balanced authority requires acknowledging risk.
Agentic AI introduces operational gains—but also governance complexity.

Up to this point, we’ve looked at agentic AI through the lens of architecture, autonomy, and enterprise deployment.
But agentic AI doesn’t exist to impress engineers.
It exists to reduce structured decision loops.
A structured decision loop has three traits:
Healthcare has them.
Finance has them.
Logistics has them.
But the most repeated structured decision loop in daily American life?
Shopping.
Shopping is where decision fatigue shows up fastest.
You’re not just buying a product. You’re asking:
Multiply that across work clothes, weekend outfits, travel, gifts, and seasonal shifts — and suddenly shopping becomes one of the most repetitive, mentally draining tasks in everyday life.
That’s why commerce becomes the most natural proving ground for agentic AI.
Because shopping isn’t just about products.
It’s about reducing friction.
And friction is exactly what agentic AI is built to handle.

The shift from a general-purpose AI to a specialized Intelligent Shopping Agent is driven by one thing: the exhaustion of the American consumer. According to The Decision Lab, the average person makes about 227 decisions a day on food alone; when you add fashion into the mix, "Choice Overload" leads to a total shutdown of the shopping experience.
We are no longer just "using" AI; we are delegating our taste to it. This isn't about a computer picking random clothes; it’s about a supportive side-character that understands the "vibe" of your life.

Agentic shopping is the evolution of commerce from a "Librarian" model (where you find the book) to an "Assistant" model (where the book is summarized and delivered). At its core, it means deploying an intelligent digital agent—think of it as an always-on, highly trained personal shopper—to handle the "Messy Middle" of research, comparison, and checkout on your behalf.
Traditional e-commerce is Product-Driven (Search → Filter → Compare → Buy). Agentic commerce is Outcome-Driven.
Step | Traditional E-commerce Flow | Agentic AI Shopping Flow |
Trigger | "I need to search for a blue waterproof jacket." | "I'm going hiking in Acadia next week." |
Workload | User scrolls 50 reviews and compares prices. | Agent scans weather, checks size, and finds top-rated items. |
Logic | Static keyword matching. | Dynamic intent reasoning (Planning Module). |
Outcome | 15 minutes of manual labor. | 15 seconds of curated discovery. |

The shift isn't just for consumers; it’s a survival strategy for the world’s biggest platforms. In 2026, Adobe Analytics reports that visitors arriving via generative AI tools spend 32% more time on-site and have a 27% lower bounce rate.
The "Infinite Aisle" of the internet has become a burden. A 2024 Accenture survey found, 74% of consumers abandoned their shopping baskets in the last three months simply because they felt bombarded by content, overwhelmed by choice and frustrated by the amount of effort they need to put into making decisions. Agentic AI acts as a filter, reducing the cognitive load from 500 choices down to the "Perfect 3."
Agentic shopping is only as good as the data it ingests. In 2026, MIT Sloan research notes that 82% of executives identify "data quality" as the primary barrier to AI success. For brands, this means accuracy and structure are no longer optional—if an agent can’t "read" your product, it won’t recommend it.
The "Big Three" of US retail have already integrated these agents into their core infrastructure:

As marketplaces embed AI tools inside their own walls, a different category is emerging: agents built around Behavioral Intelligence and Dynamic Personalization. Glance operates as a crucial layer in this ecosystem. It is an intelligent shopping agent, not a marketplace. Its role is to bridge the gap between your real-world behavior and the infinite inventory of the web Glance It – Shop It.
Glance is structured around a dynamic AI Twin—a digital counterpart that learns continuously from your behavior. Unlike static recommendation systems that rely on what you say you like, Glance’s Self-Learning Personalization Engine adapts based on micro-behavioral signals:
Note: The AI Twin is a behavioral model, not a "costume simulator." It doesn't just overlay clothes on a photo; it models your aesthetic evolution so that discovery feels like an intuition, not a search.
Traditional E-commerce | Glance’s Agentic Layer |
Search-First: User does the labor of typing keywords. | Behavior-First: Observe micro-signals to anticipate intent. |
Filter-Heavy: Manual sorting by size, price, and color. | Context-Aware: Interpret weather, location, and timing. |
Product Tiles: A grid of isolated items. | Contextual Looks: Surface fully styled, cohesive outfits. |
Static Results: Same results regardless of your "vibe." | Dynamic Adaptation: Real-time matches to live inventory. |

If Agentic AI is the solution, Fashion is the ultimate problem. In the US, fashion is the "Highest-Friction" category because it involves three volatile variables: Fit, Style, and Occasion.
Trend-driven. Socially influenced.
Agents help filter social velocity into structured choices without endless scrolling.
Time-constrained. Balancing career and family.
Agents reduce decision fatigue around workwear, travel packing, and coordinated outfits.
Practical and quality-focused.
Agents prioritize durability, brand consistency, and sizing reliability.
Less interested in navigating complex interfaces.
Agents simplify discovery through guided intent rather than layered filters.
The system adapts to behavior.
The friction disappears differently.
By acting as a supportive side-character that understands these nuances, an agent like Glance ensures you spend less time "shopping" and more time actually "wearing."
The next frontier is Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Commerce. Gartner Predicts By 2028 AI Agents Will Outnumber Sellers by 10X. We are moving from a world where we "go shopping" to a world where "shopping happens for us."
The era of "Artificial Intelligence as a Librarian" is over. We have entered the age of the Agentic AI assistant—a transition that is fundamentally redefining the American experience from one of constant searching to one of seamless discovery. Whether it is Walmart’s "Super Agents" optimizing national supply chains or Glance acting as a supportive side-character for your wardrobe, the goal remains the same: reducing friction.
By delegating the "labor of looking" to intelligent agents, consumers reclaim their most valuable resource—time. As we move toward a future where agents outnumber sellers, the act of "going shopping" is being replaced by the luxury of having shopping happen for you. In this new reality, the friction of choice disappears, leaving only the satisfaction of the find.
1. What is agentic AI in simple terms?
Agentic AI refers to artificial intelligence systems that can autonomously pursue goals. Unlike generative AI, which produces responses based on prompts, agentic AI plans tasks, uses tools, monitors outcomes, and adjusts actions to achieve a defined objective with limited human intervention.
2. How is agentic AI different from generative AI?
Generative AI focuses on producing content such as text or images in response to prompts. Agentic AI, by contrast, is goal driven. It integrates memory, planning modules, tool usage, and feedback loops to execute multi-step tasks rather than simply generating outputs.
3. Why is commerce an early use case for agentic AI?
Commerce involves frequent, constraint-based decisions such as price comparison, sizing evaluation, and delivery timing. Because these decisions are repetitive and data-heavy, agentic AI can reduce cognitive load by evaluating options autonomously and narrowing choices intelligently.
4. How does an intelligent shopping agent like Glance help with decision fatigue?
Glance acts as an intelligent shopping agent by using a self-learning engine to filter thousands of options into a curated shortlist. By observing behavioral signals like dwell time, it surfaces what you need before you have to search for it.
5. Is agentic AI fully autonomous?
Not always. Many agentic AI systems operate within “human-in-the-loop” frameworks. High-risk decisions — such as financial approvals or medical actions — often require human validation to ensure accountability and regulatory compliance.
6. What industries are adopting agentic AI the fastest?
Retail, logistics, finance, and customer support sectors are early adopters. According to McKinsey and Deloitte research, organizations using AI-driven automation are seeing improvements in operational efficiency, supply chain optimization, and response times.
7. Is agentic AI regulated in the United States?
Federal AI regulation in the U.S. is evolving. The White House Executive Order on AI emphasizes explainability and responsible development, while NIST provides risk management frameworks to guide safe implementation.
8. What are the risks of agentic AI?
Risks include over-automation, hallucination errors from underlying language models, infrastructure costs, and accountability challenges. Responsible deployment requires governance frameworks, auditability, and transparent decision logic.